2010年6月22日星期二

the frequency of just the European \management services

Source: Sichuan Online



\



China's \

\Space officials are hurrying, rushed to Munich, Germany, on the dispute for half a year's navigation satellite radiation frequency, \The two sides raging, and a fierce battle. EU officials have spent the frequency hand from the Americans, \\try.
talks end without progress, wait for the next round of negotiations. In the construction of the global satellite navigation system is concerned, the Chinese and European co-operation from the first move towards competition between China and Europe reflects the deep-seated structural problems and the strategic interests of the conflict, and conflict behind them and since Europe has been revealed China would take the arrogance and exclusion. This is not about well-known domestic dispute, in fact, a long time, to clarify the context, have to start from the most talked about China-EU cooperation contract.
honeymoon period (years 2003 -2004) Central Europe complement each other against a unipolar world
2003 years in Europe, everywhere filled with anti-American anti-war sentiment. U.S. insistence on the implementation of unilateral foreign policy, despite the international community, brazenly launched the war in Iraq, the Europeans felt the \French President Jacques Chirac when he was advocated establishment of a \In this context, the EU decided to include China in the EU in 2002 had launched the \News spread, shocked the United States.
has been America's global satellite positioning system GPS navigation field unmatched in the civilian world, even contemporary with the Russian \incomplete, has already faded international markets simply do not have the one to compete with GPS capability. The EU launched the \By design, \To break the monopoly of GPS, \
several years ago, China's regional satellite navigation and positioning systems has made considerable progress in 2000, have launched two experimental geostationary orbit, navigation satellites, in April 2003 it launched the third satellite, \orbit \
to the \belongs to the regional, its commercial value is not high. In this context, the European initiative to \
Europe to include China, not only the leaders of some European countries pocketed the political capital, but also to \laid the foundation for the market. The end of 2003, the Chinese actually complete a regional navigation system, \China and the EU signed the 2004 technical cooperation agreement, China pledged 230 million euros of huge funds, the first 70 million euros of EU funds soon hit the account.
cooperation between China and the EU, both strategic interests also have practical advantages. Some commented that the China-EU cooperation in high technology, essentially breaking the US-led arms embargo in Europe, but also the equivalent of abandonment against specific countries like China, Europe and the United States in Arms Regulations (ITAR), the ultimate legal level, lifting the arms embargo torn a hole in the. As the satellite navigation in modern warfare play an increasingly significant role,it is not objective nor realistic. Of course, the United States or even threatened, if the United States feel threatened, you have the right to wreck, \
transition period (2005 -2007 years) joint US-European politics to squeeze out Chinese
2005, the \\Although this is an experimental satellite, not to the final layout of one of 30 navigation satellites, but \
, however, entered in 2005, European politics began to shift, before the \The new prime minister, the leaders of France have entered the era of the turn, Chirac's influence declined, the pro-US politicians Nicolas? Sarkozy began in 2007 as President of France.
pro-American political figures have come to power, to the European Union to build a \In this context, the European Space Agency and the United States, \But this kind of technology to re-amendment, but spent a lot of money outside the budget. In return, the United States agreed to technically support the \
just started at this time, the European Union as \Also started from this time, the EU began to squeeze the Chinese. Seeing a large amount of funds, but not commensurate with treatment, even treatment is also lower than not put a dime in the other non-EU countries such as India and other countries, the Chinese greatly dissatisfied. China is not only not get into the \no income but have to bear a huge capital investment, this kind of \
In this context, the Chinese began to turn its attention to quiet a few years, \Fourth satellites launched in 2007, \The end of 2007, China successfully launched the first \
China's sincere cooperation with the EU would have a start position \However, contrary to expectations, the EU, \leave the funds into bickering of the European Union.
competition (2008 -2,009 years), \navigation system setback, China's decision to \November 2006, China announced it would launch navigation satellites within the next few years, developing its own global satellite navigation and positioning system, the end of 2007, the global coverage of the \
At this point, internal friction in the EU still does not disengage itself. Until April 27, 2008, \.
\future market prospects. \On the other hand, before the \\To change the passive situation, the Europeans left with no alternative, only increase the financial input, but this time the European Space Agency in order to expel the Chinese, has the form of law stipulates that all development funds are public funds from the EU, which means that, in order to increase large investment had to endless in-house \
Europeans began to sour that China's \another example. The need for strategy, China has not completely abandoned and the EU, \
in accordance with the International Telecommunication Union general procedures, China has notified the organization prepared to use the satellite transmission frequency, the frequency of just the European \management services, \
Channel is a scarce resource. Upper hand in the United States and Russia have the best use of each frequency, the frequency of Chinese and China is considered the United States and Russia after the \
in accordance with the \However, in 2009 China will launch three \array to the next, and thus lose ownership of the frequency.
EU around the \If Europe does not give up the ego and arrogant attitude, continued discrimination and repression in China, then, the last thing Europe's own losses.

没有评论:

发表评论